Betancourt Girolami 2015 - HMC for Hierarchical Models

Routing Summary

This folder fully captures Betancourt & Girolami (2015), Hamiltonian Monte Carlo for Hierarchical Models (arXiv:1312.0906): hierarchical geometry and the funnel, failure of Gibbs/Metropolis, reparameterisation, the two weaknesses of Euclidean HMC, Riemannian HMC with SoftAbs, the 800-group one-way normal benchmark (Table I) and all Stan models. 6 notes. Motivating PyMC examples: E12, E86.

Concept Map

ConceptNoteTypeDepends OnKey Result
One-level hierarchyBetancourt 2015 - Hierarchical Geometry and the Funneldefinition—funnel when data are sparse
Funnel distributionBetancourt 2015 - Hierarchical Geometry and the Funneldefinitionhierarchy, curvature varies
Why Gibbs/RWM failBetancourt 2015 - Gibbs, Random-Walk Metropolis and Reparameterisationtheoremfunnelconditional variance marginal variance
Non-centred parameterisationBetancourt 2015 - Gibbs, Random-Walk Metropolis and Reparameterisationdefinition—,
Step-size stabilityBetancourt 2015 - Euclidean HMC Weaknesses - Step Size and Density Variationtheoremleapfrog
Density variation limitBetancourt 2015 - Euclidean HMC Weaknesses - Step Size and Density Variationtheorem conserved
Riemannian HMCBetancourt 2015 - Riemannian HMC and the SoftAbs MetricdefinitionBetancourt 2015 - Euclidean HMC Weaknesses - Step Size and Density Variationlog-det term allows large
SoftAbs metricBetancourt 2015 - Riemannian HMC and the SoftAbs MetricdefinitionHessianpositive-definite Hessian
Table IBetancourt 2015 - One-Way Normal Experiments and Stan ModelsexampleallEHMC 75x/18x (CP) and 49x/66x (NCP) vs Metropolis/Gibbs

Notes

Sources

  • Betancourt Girolami 2015 - Hamiltonian Monte Carlo for Hierarchical Models — Betancourt M, Girolami M (2015), arXiv:1312.0906v1, 11 pages.

See Also