Griffiths 2011 - Infinite Mixtures and the CRP Review

Summary

The CRP can be derived as the limit of a symmetric Dirichlet-multinomial prior on class assignments, after collapsing assignments into partitions (equivalence classes). This is the template the IBP copies for binary features.

Main Content

Latent class model. Object has class and properties . With and .

Finite prior on assignments (Eq. 3)

It is exchangeable but allows at most classes.

Equivalence classes. Because is invariant to relabelling, work with partitions (e.g. ). With ( used classes), the number of assignment vectors in the partition class is .

Infinite limit gives the CRP partition law (Eq. 5)

Proof sketch: expand ; multiply by so the cancels , leaving .

Sequential form (Eq. 6, CRP). Customer sits at occupied table with probability and at a new table with probability . The first customer sits at table 1 with probability one. The CRP is attributed to Pitman and Dubins; Aldous 1985 first described it. Pitman (2002) gives the depth.

Gibbs sampling (2.4). (Bush and MacEachern 1996; Neal 2000). By exchangeability take as the last customer. The paper also notes variational methods (Blei and Jordan 2006).

Examples

Three customers

, : partition has , : . Partition : . Partition : . Three partitions of type sum to , plus plus equals .

Connections

Teh’s entry gives the same law with the urn: Teh 2010 - Blackwell-MacQueen Urn and Chinese Restaurant Process. The EPPF viewpoint: De Blasi 2015 - EPPF and Predictive Structure.

See Also

Griffiths 2011 - The Indian Buffet Process - Overview, Griffiths 2011 - Equivalence Classes and the Infinite Limit