Izmailov 2021 - Bayesian Neural Network Posteriors

Routing Summary

Full capture of Izmailov, Vikram, Hoffman & Wilson (2021), What Are Bayesian Neural Network Posteriors Really Like? (ICML; arXiv 2104.14421): full-batch HMC as a gold standard, mixing diagnostics in weight vs function space, in-domain gains and domain-shift failure, cold posteriors, priors, and the fidelity of cheaper approximations. 6 notes.

Concept Map

ConceptNoteTypeDepends OnKey Result
Bayesian model averageIzmailov 2021 - Bayesian Neural Network Posteriors - Overviewdefinitionposterior
Trajectory length ruleIzmailov 2021 - Full-Batch HMC for Neural Networksdefinitionprior sd
SGMCMC biasIzmailov 2021 - Full-Batch HMC for Neural NetworksdefinitionMH correctionno MH step, subsampling noise
Function-space Izmailov 2021 - Mixing Diagnostics and Posterior GeometrydefinitionGelman-Rubin91% / 98% of predictions have
Strong mode connectivity (finding)Izmailov 2021 - Mixing Diagnostics and Posterior GeometrytheoremGaripov 2018HMC uses connecting paths
CIFAR-10-C failureIzmailov 2021 - Predictive Performance and Domain ShiftexampleOODHMC worst under shift
Tempered posteriorIzmailov 2021 - Priors, Prior Predictive and Cold PosteriorsdefinitionWenzel 2020no cold effect without augmentation
Function-space priorIzmailov 2021 - Priors, Prior Predictive and Cold Posteriorstheoremarchitecturearchitecture matters more than
Agreement / TVIzmailov 2021 - Cheaper Approximations versus HMCdefinitionHMC predictiveMFVI worst; ensembles beat SGLD in TV

Notes

Sources

Izmailov 2021 - What Are Bayesian Neural Network Posteriors Really Like.

See Also

HMC and Stan in Practice, Variational Inference - Overview, Chipman 2010 - BART - Overview.