Bürkner 2021 - Response Families and Distributional IRT

Summary

IRT models are specified by a response distribution (the “family”) whose parameters are predicted from person and item parameters. Bürkner reviews the families used for binary, categorical, ordinal, count, proportion, response-time and joint choice-and-time data.

Overview

General form: with data in long format (one row per person-item response), which fits multilevel syntax.

Main Content

Families and their IRT models

Response typeFamilyResulting IRT model
BinaryBernoulli, 1PL, 2PL, 3PL
Unordered categorical, levelsCategorical, nominal; equals Bernoulli
OrdinalCumulative: , logistic Graded response model (GRM; Samejima)
OrdinalAdjacent category: , thresholds need not be orderedPartial credit model (PCM; Rasch; generalised PCM used in PISA)
CountPoisson, Rasch-Poisson-counts model
Proportion of total ()Beta, mean-precision comparative judgement
Compositional ()Dirichletcomparative judgement
Response timeExgaussian, shifted lognormalRT-IRT
Choice + response timeWiener diffusion: drift, boundary separation, non-decision time, biasdrift-diffusion IRT
^def-irt-families

Notes. In the Wiener model the initial bias is typically fixed at 0.5 for IRT, giving the three-parameter drift-diffusion model. Exgaussian lets one parameterize the mean directly (easier interpretation) at some theoretical cost versus the shifted lognormal. Response times vary over persons and items in mean, spread and right-skew, so three parameters are warranted.

Examples

Choosing a family for a survey battery

Setup. A brand-attribute grid collects (a) agree/disagree, (b) 5-point agree scales, (c) seconds to respond. Solution. (a) Bernoulli-logit (1PL/2PL); (b) cumulative-logit (GRM) with item-specific threshold shifts; (c) exgaussian with person and item effects on location, scale, skew. Interpretation. One framework, one sampler, one set of post-processing tools for all three.

Connections

See Also

Bürkner 2021 - IRT Model Classes 1PL 2PL and Extensions