Limits via Representables

Summary

The cone functor sending is a presheaf. The limit is exactly the representing object of this functor: naturally. Consequently, limits are unique up to isomorphism, and the limit functor is right adjoint to the diagonal functor .

Overview

Chapter 6 unifies the three main themes of the book. It begins by showing that limits are representable functors (Ch. 6.1). This is the formal unification: the language of representability and the Yoneda lemma now governs limits directly.

Main Content

Cones as Natural Transformations

Recall that a cone over with vertex is a natural transformation in .

Proposition 6.1.1: Cones are Representable (BCT, Ch. 6.1)

There is a natural isomorphism

So the functor , , is the functor .

A limit of is a representation of : an object and a natural isomorphism .

Limits are Unique Up to Isomorphism

Corollary 6.1.2: Limits Are Unique (BCT, Ch. 6.1)

If and both represent (i.e., are both limits of ), then via a unique isomorphism compatible with the universal cones.

Proof: Any two representations of the same functor are isomorphic, by the Yoneda lemma (^unique-rep).

The Limit Functor and Its Adjoint

Proposition 6.1.4: (BCT, Ch. 6.1)

If has all limits of shape , then the limit construction is a functor that is right adjoint to the diagonal functor .

The adjunction bijection is:

Wait — actually this is for limits: , so .

Correction: It is (diagonal is left adjoint to limit). The unit is the universal cone ; the counit is (limit of constant diagram is that object).

Dually, : the diagonal is right adjoint to the colimit functor.

Limits of Functors

Example: Limits of Sequences (BCT, Ch. 6.1)

For (reverse natural numbers as a poset), a diagram is a sequence (inverse system). Its limit is the inverse limit .

Example in Set: (the -adic integers).

Example: Limits Commute with Limits (BCT, Prop. 6.2.8)

For any diagram shape and and any diagram :

whenever the relevant limits exist.

Connections

See Also