Dwork 2006 - Calibrating Noise to Sensitivity
Routing Summary
This folder fully captures Dwork, McSherry, Nissim and Smith (2006), Calibrating Noise to Sensitivity in Private Data Analysis (TCC 2006; J. Privacy and Confidentiality 7(3):17-51, 2016-17 reprint): the founding paper of differential privacy. It defines -DP, proves the Laplace mechanism (non-adaptive and adaptive), computes sensitivities of histograms, covariance and sampled functions, generalises to metric spaces, and proves interactive/non-interactive separation. 9 notes cover every section, theorem, proof and example.
- Need the paper on one page, headline results, or the section-to-note map? → Dwork 2006 - Calibrating Noise to Sensitivity - Overview
- Need the pre-DP history (Dinur-Nissim, SuLQ, -anonymity), the contributions list or the smoker example? → Dwork 2006 - Motivation, Contributions and Related Work
- Need the definition of -DP, neighbours, randomized response, Laplace count, or why total variation fails? → Dwork 2006 - Differential Privacy Definition and Basic Examples
- Need postprocessing, composition (simple and adaptive with budget), group privacy proofs, or the hypothesis-testing interpretation (Eq. 3)? → Dwork 2006 - Postprocessing, Composition and Group Privacy
- Need global sensitivity, the Laplace mechanism theorem and proof, or the adaptive version (Thm. 3.4)? → Dwork 2006 - Sensitivity and the Laplace Mechanism
- Need sensitivity of histograms, mean and covariance (the mechanism), distance-from-property, or Lemma 3.5? → Dwork 2006 - Low-Sensitivity Functions and Applications
- Need noise for non-numeric outputs, the precursor of the exponential mechanism (Thm. 3.7), or the survey of later work? → Dwork 2006 - Sensitivity in General Metric Spaces
- Need the impossibility results for non-interactive and local release (Thm. 4.1, Prop. 4.2)? → Dwork 2006 - Interactive versus Non-Interactive Separation Results
- Need the hybrid argument, Lemma 4.3 and Claim 4.4 proofs? → Dwork 2006 - Proof of the Separation Lemma
Concept Map
| Concept | Note | Type | Depends On | Key Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neighbouring datasets, set-difference metric | Dwork 2006 - Differential Privacy Definition and Basic Examples | definition | histogram representation | neighbours at distance 1; Hamming costs factor 2 |
| -differential privacy (Def. 2.1, 2.3) | Dwork 2006 - Differential Privacy Definition and Basic Examples | definition | neighbours | |
| Randomized response (Example 1) | Dwork 2006 - Differential Privacy Definition and Basic Examples | example | Def. 2.1 | -DP; sd |
| Total variation is insufficient (Example 3) | Dwork 2006 - Differential Privacy Definition and Basic Examples | example | Def. 2.1 | subsampling has SD yet is not DP |
| Closure under postprocessing (Prop. 2.4) | Dwork 2006 - Postprocessing, Composition and Group Privacy | theorem | Def. 2.1 | is -DP |
| Composition (Lemmas 2.5, 2.6) | Dwork 2006 - Postprocessing, Composition and Group Privacy | theorem | Def. 2.1 | , even adaptively |
| Group privacy (Def. 2.7, Lemma 2.8) | Dwork 2006 - Postprocessing, Composition and Group Privacy | theorem | Def. 2.1 | |
| sensitivity (Def. 3.1) | Dwork 2006 - Sensitivity and the Laplace Mechanism | definition | neighbours | |
| Laplace mechanism (Prop. 3.3) | Dwork 2006 - Sensitivity and the Laplace Mechanism | theorem | is -DP | |
| Adaptive Laplace mechanism (Thm. 3.4) | Dwork 2006 - Sensitivity and the Laplace Mechanism | theorem | Prop. 3.3 | while joint |
| Disjoint analyses; distance from property | Dwork 2006 - Low-Sensitivity Functions and Applications | theorem | Def. 3.1 | , dimension-free |
| Private mean and covariance | Dwork 2006 - Low-Sensitivity Functions and Applications | example | composition | -DP; noise gains and |
| Lemma 3.5 (low sample complexity) | Dwork 2006 - Low-Sensitivity Functions and Applications | theorem | Def. 3.1 | |
| Metric-space sensitivity, Thm. 3.7 | Dwork 2006 - Sensitivity in General Metric Spaces | theorem | triangle inequality | sampling is -DP |
| Non-interactive separation (Thm. 4.1, Prop. 4.2) | Dwork 2006 - Interactive versus Non-Interactive Separation Results | theorem | Obs. 1 | needs -scale databases |
| Lemma 4.3, Claim 4.4, hybrid argument | Dwork 2006 - Proof of the Separation Lemma | theorem | pairwise independence |
Notes
- Dwork 2006 - Calibrating Noise to Sensitivity - Overview — CONTAINS: research question, contributions, key-results table, full Source Map (every section to note), marketing-measurement angle.
- Dwork 2006 - Motivation, Contributions and Related Work — CONTAINS: setting, noisy-sum precursors, contributions 1-4, the smoker example, related-work table (Agrawal-Srikant, Evfimievski, Dinur-Nissim, -anonymity), discussion (OnTheMap, RAPPOR).
- Dwork 2006 - Differential Privacy Definition and Basic Examples — CONTAINS: Def. dataset/neighbours, Remark 2.1 (Hamming factor 2), Def. 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, Examples 1-3 with derived estimator variance, nonnegligible-leakage argument, Python.
- Dwork 2006 - Postprocessing, Composition and Group Privacy — CONTAINS: Prop. 2.4 + proof, Lemmas 2.5, 2.6 + proof, Def. 2.7, Lemma 2.8 + proof, Sec. 2.2 interpretations (hypothesis-testing Eq. 3, game-theoretic, variants), budgeted-curator Python.
- Dwork 2006 - Sensitivity and the Laplace Mechanism — CONTAINS: Def. 3.1, Example 4, Def. 3.2, Prop. 3.3 + proof, Thm. 3.4 + proof, accuracy corollary, density-ratio Python check.
- Dwork 2006 - Low-Sensitivity Functions and Applications — CONTAINS: disjoint analyses, distance from property, mean/covariance mechanism, Lemma 3.5 + proof, Reed-Solomon counterexample, Python.
- Dwork 2006 - Sensitivity in General Metric Spaces — CONTAINS: Def. 3.6, Eq. (6), Thm. 3.7 + proof, Remark 3.1, Hamming-cube example (flip-probability note), Sec. 3.4 survey.
- Dwork 2006 - Interactive versus Non-Interactive Separation Results — CONTAINS: non-interactive mechanism definition, Observation 1, Thm. 4.1, local mechanisms, Prop. 4.2, Dinur-Nissim comparison, numeric reading, Sec. 4.4.
- Dwork 2006 - Proof of the Separation Lemma — CONTAINS: Lemma 4.3, Claim 4.4 + proof (with a corrected sign check), hybrid proofs of Thm. 4.1 and Prop. 4.2, numerical verification.
Sources
- Dwork 2006 - Calibrating Noise to Sensitivity in Private Data Analysis — Dwork C, McSherry F, Nissim K, Smith A (2016-17), J. Privacy and Confidentiality 7(3): 17-51 (reprint of TCC 2006, pp. 265-284), 36 PDF pages; the sole source for all notes.
See Also
- Dwork Roth 2014 - Algorithmic Foundations of Differential Privacy Ch 1-3 - Overview — textbook treatment of the same definitions and mechanisms.
- Wasserman Zhou 2010 - A Statistical Framework for Differential Privacy - Overview — statistical interpretation and rates of convergence.
- Power Analysis and Sample Size, Identity Fragmentation and the Privacy-Era Limits of User-Level Tests, Bayesian Media Mix Modeling - Overview — measurement-side context.