Meinshausen Buhlmann 2010 - Stability Selection

Routing Summary

This folder fully captures Meinshausen & Bühlmann (2010), Stability Selection (JRSS-B; arXiv:0809.2932v2, 30 pp.) in 12 notes. Stability selection runs any sparse selector on many half-samples, keeps variables with a high selection frequency, bounds the expected number of false selections in finite samples, and with a randomised Lasso is consistent without the irrepresentable condition.

Concept Map

ConceptNoteTypeDepends OnKey Result
Sparse structure , ; Lasso; graphical LassoStability Selection Setup - Structure Estimation with Lasso and Graphical Lassodefinition—eqs (1)-(4)
Selection probability (Def. 1)Stability Paths and the Stable-Variable SetdefinitionSetupHalf-samples without replacement
Stable set (Def. 2)Stability Paths and the Stable-Variable SetdefinitionDef. 1
Riboflavin permutation exampleStability Paths and the Stable-Variable SetexampleDef. 1-2CV admits 14 null genes; randomised SS separates all 6
PFER bound (Thm 1)Stability Selection PFER Bound (Theorem 1) and Its ProoftheoremDef. 3, exchangeability
Simultaneous selection (Def. 5, Lemma 1)Stability Selection PFER Bound (Theorem 1) and Its ProoflemmaDef. 1
Pointwise controlStability Selection PFER Bound (Theorem 1) and Its ProofdefinitionThm 1
Graphical-model SS, costStability Selection for Gaussian Graphical Models and Computational CostexampleThm 1 of 12720 edges; ≈3× 10-fold CV
Irrepresentable condition (12)Randomised Lasso and the Irrepresentable ConditiondefinitionSetupNeeded for Lasso consistency
Randomised Lasso (13)Randomised Lasso and the Irrepresentable ConditiondefinitionLassoPenalties in
Sparse eigenvalues (Def. 4, Asm 1)Randomised Lasso Consistency under Stability Selection (Theorem 2)definition—
Consistency of SS + randomised Lasso (Thm 2)Randomised Lasso Consistency under Stability Selection (Theorem 2)theoremAsm 1No noise selected for all
ROMP, exact recovery condition (19)Randomised Orthogonal Matching Pursuit (ROMP) for Stability SelectionalgorithmRandomised LassoConsistency claimed under relaxed ERC
Designs A-G, Figs 5-7Stability Selection Simulation Study - Designs A-G and ResultsexampleThm 1-2SS ≥ base method except design A; FP control vs CV
Per-cell power values, Figs 5-6Stability Selection Figs 5-6 - Per-Cell Power ReadingsexampleDesigns A-GLasso 0.40 → SS 0.63 → SS+rand 0.67 (avg, 0.1s); Fig. 6 exceptions
Limitations and practiceStability Selection - Discussion, Limitations and PracticeconceptallExchangeability, i.i.d. resampling, not causal
BibliographyStability Selection (Meinshausen Buhlmann 2010) - Bibliography and Cited Worksreference—48 works; Zhang & Huang (2008) drives Lemma 4

Notes

  • Meinshausen Buhlmann 2010 - Stability Selection - Overview — CONTAINS: research question, contributions, key findings, full Source Map (section → note), dependency chain
  • Stability Selection Setup - Structure Estimation with Lasso and Graphical Lasso — CONTAINS: §1-1.2; sparse / definition; linear model (1); Lasso (2); Gaussian graphical model (3); graphical Lasso (4); clustering/consensus clustering remark
  • Stability Paths and the Stable-Variable Set — CONTAINS: §2-2.3; Def. 1 selection probabilities (5); Remark 1; stability path; Def. 2 stable variables (7); eq. (6); median probability model link; stability-selection algorithm; Example I riboflavin permutation (Fig. 1), CV picks 14 null genes Fig. 1 per-panel plot readings (top-4 separation band ≈0.47-0.74; α=0.2 all 6 above top permuted ≈0.29).
  • Stability Selection PFER Bound (Theorem 1) and Its Proof — CONTAINS: §2.4; Def. 3; Theorem 1 (8)-(9); PFER/PCER/FWER; exchangeability discussion; calibration table (, ); via ; pointwise control; App. §6.1 Def. 5 (20), Lemma 1 (21) with proof; §6.2 Lemma 2, proof of Thm 1; calibration-arithmetic check (2.5 vs 4); minimal-PFER check ( vs ) Π̂^{simult,q} typo flag.
  • Stability Selection for Gaussian Graphical Models and Computational Cost — CONTAINS: §2.5 Example II (Fig. 2 real, Fig. 3 permuted null); §2.6 cost accounting (25 vs 8.1 fits; ratio 3 or 5.5; 10 s timing) Figs 2-3 panel-by-panel readings (null-row stability edges 1, 2, 3, 1, 0, 0).
  • Randomised Lasso and the Irrepresentable Condition — CONTAINS: §3 model (10), consistency (11); §3 intro claims (plain subsampling already gives large gains; Random-Forest-style randomisation); irrepresentable condition (12); adaptive Lasso/thresholding; randomised Lasso (13) and weight scheme; weakness trade-off; relation to Bolasso/adaptive Lasso/thresholding; §3.2 toy example (Fig. 4) Fig. 4 readings (variable-3 peak ≈0.99/0.83/0.71 for α=1/0.5/0.2; ρ for figure unstated).
  • Randomised Lasso Consistency under Stability Selection (Theorem 2) — CONTAINS: Def. 4 (14); Assumption 1 (15) vs sparse Riesz (16); Theorem 2 (17)-(18); Remarks 2-4; App. §6.3 Def. 6; Lemmas 3-7 (22)-(34) with step-by-step proofs (probability splits, tail, union bound, projection invariance, KKT monotonicity); radical checked against page image; eq. (26) constant check; proof map Lemma 3 step-1 inequality chain (s≥1).
  • Randomised Orthogonal Matching Pursuit (ROMP) for Stability Selection — CONTAINS: §3.3 FoBa/MC+ mention; ROMP algorithm; exact recovery condition (19); claimed consistency result; artificial noise covariates caveat; “sufficient and necessary” vs “sufficient” note; OMP/ROMP results table from Fig. 6
  • Stability Selection Simulation Study - Designs A-G and Results — CONTAINS: §4 ADEMP framing; designs (A)-(G); response generation (SNR 0.5/2, Bayes 1/8, 1/3); performance measure; Fig. 5 header table (violations, max cor); per-design numeric reading of Fig. 5 and Fig. 6 incl. exceptions; headline findings; Fig. 7 error-control experiment with numeric ranges per panel
  • Stability Selection Figs 5-6 - Per-Cell Power Readings — CONTAINS: per-cell tables (Lasso/SS/SS+rand, 0.1s and 0.4s) for Fig. 5 Lasso regression, Fig. 6 logistic Lasso and OMP; averages; exceptions where base method wins; 60-vs-64 cell count note
  • Stability Selection - Discussion, Limitations and Practice — CONTAINS: §5 claims; limitations table; what SS does not deliver; practitioner checklist; SHAP-mass contrast; gaps (JRSS-B discussion, arithmetic flags) consolidated errata table (incl. Π̂^{simult,q} typo).
  • Stability Selection (Meinshausen Buhlmann 2010) - Bibliography and Cited Works — CONTAINS: all 48 references grouped by role with citation pages

Sources

  • Meinshausen Buhlmann 2010 - Stability Selection — Meinshausen & Bühlmann (2010), JRSS-B 72(4):417-473; arXiv:0809.2932v2 (all notes)

See Also