Regression Discontinuity Designs
Summary
RD designs exploit precise knowledge of rules determining treatment. When treatment is assigned based on a threshold in a running variable, comparing outcomes just above and below the cutoff provides credible causal estimates. Sharp RD is a selection-on-observables story; fuzzy RD is an IV strategy.
Sharp RD
Treatment is a deterministic, discontinuous function of a covariate:
The regression model:
where is a smooth function (often modeled with polynomials).
Parametric approach
Nonparametric approach
Compare means in a small neighborhood :
Key Example: Incumbency advantage (Lee, 2008)
- Running variable: vote share margin of victory
- Treatment: winning the current election
- Result: ~40 percentage point incumbency advantage in re-election probability
Fuzzy RD
Treatment probability jumps at the threshold but doesn’t go from 0 to 1:
Fuzzy RD = IV with as the instrument for .
Key Example: Class size in Israel (Angrist & Lavy, 1999)
- Maimonides’ Rule: class size capped at 40; cohort of 41 splits into two classes
- Instrument: predicted class size from the rule ()
- Result: 7-student reduction raises math scores by ~1.75 points (0.18σ)
Validity Checks
- Pre-treatment covariates should show no jump at
- Density of should be smooth at (no bunching/manipulation)
- Discontinuity sample robustness: results should be stable as the window narrows
Nonlinearity vs. Discontinuity
A sharp turn in can be mistaken for a jump due to treatment. Use flexible functional forms and restrict to observations near the cutoff.
See Also
- Instrumental Variables — fuzzy RD is IV
- Local Average Treatment Effects — fuzzy RD estimates LATE on compliers at the cutoff
- Mostly Harmless Econometrics - Overview
- Model Checking — posterior predictive checks for formalizing RD validity tests
- The Experimental Ideal — RD approximates a local experiment at the cutoff; the ideal benchmark it approximates