Gebru 2021 - Datasheets for Datasets - Overview
Summary
Gebru, Morgenstern, Vecchione, Vaughan, Wallach, Daumé III and Crawford propose that every dataset ship with a datasheet, modelled on electronics component datasheets, that documents its motivation, composition, collection process, preprocessing, uses, distribution and maintenance. The contribution is a reviewed question set (about 50 prompts) organised along the dataset lifecycle plus a worked example for the Pang and Lee movie-review polarity data. The takeaway for benchmark builders is that a benchmark is a dataset plus a set of claims about what it measures, and the datasheet is the minimum disclosure that lets a consumer judge those claims.
Overview
Research question. Data characteristics shape model behaviour, yet “there is currently no standardized process for documenting machine learning datasets.” Mismatch between a dataset and a deployment context, or hidden societal bias in a dataset, can cause harm in criminal justice, hiring, infrastructure and finance, and can cost revenue or reputation elsewhere.
Contribution.
- An analogy to electronics datasheets (operating characteristics, test results, recommended usage) applied to datasets.
- A question set grouped by the dataset lifecycle: motivation, composition, collection process, preprocessing/cleaning/labeling, uses, distribution, maintenance.
- A workflow: which questions to read before collecting, which to answer after, and which before distribution.
- A two-year development process with feedback from dozens of researchers, two industry product teams and lawyers.
- An appendix datasheet (4 figures) for Pang and Lee’s Movie Review Polarity dataset.
Key results. (This is a framework paper; there are no theorems or tables of estimates.)
- Two stakeholder groups: creators (reflect on creation, distribution, maintenance, assumptions, harms) and consumers (informed selection, avoid misuse).
- Datasheets are explicitly not automated: automation “run[s] counter to our objective of encouraging dataset creators to carefully reflect.”
- Questions are not prescriptive; they vary by domain and organisation, and inapplicable ones are skipped.
- Datasheets do not solve bias or harm; they impose real overhead; and dynamic datasets are awkward.
Main Content
Source Map
Datasheet for a dataset
A structured document accompanying a dataset that answers questions about its motivation, composition, collection process, preprocessing/cleaning/labeling, uses, distribution and maintenance, written by reflecting on (not auto-generating) the dataset’s lifecycle, for the benefit of both dataset creators and dataset consumers.
Examples
The worked example in the paper is the Movie Review Polarity datasheet; see Gebru 2021 - Example Datasheet for the Movie Review Polarity Dataset. A marketing-measurement analogue is sketched in Gebru 2021 - Impact, Challenges and a Marketing Measurement Datasheet.
Connections
- Benchmark validity. Dehghani 2021 - The Benchmark Lottery - Overview cites Gebru et al. as a checklist for benchmark creation (motivation, composition, collection, recommended uses). A datasheet answers “what is this benchmark a sample of, and for what is it valid?”, which is the question task-selection bias exposes.
- Experimental benchmarks for ads. Experiment-derived benchmark datasets such as those in Experimental Benchmarks for Observational Ad Measurement have exactly the composition and collection issues the datasheet probes (who was randomized, what was logged, what is missing).
- Simulation benchmarks. Dorie 2019 - ACIC 2016 Causal Inference Competition - Overview shows the synthetic counterpart: a competition whose released code and knob table play the role of a datasheet for a family of DGPs.
See Also
- Gebru 2021 - Motivation, Objectives and Development Process
- Gebru 2021 - Questions I - Motivation, Composition and Collection Process
- Gebru 2021 - Questions II - Preprocessing, Uses, Distribution and Maintenance
- Gebru 2021 - Example Datasheet for the Movie Review Polarity Dataset
- Gebru 2021 - Impact, Challenges and a Marketing Measurement Datasheet
- Researcher Degrees of Freedom